| |
Section 3:
How do biofilms impact our world?
|
|
Test your
knowledge | Go to Section
Four
|
About Section
3
|
|
In section 2 of this module you learned
that biofilms form and grow in practically every possible environment on
earth. That being the case, what is their impact on earth?
Can we use them for beneficial purpose? How do they affect human life? We
explore these questions here.
|
Objectives and Outcomes of Section 3
|
|
Objectives
The objectives of this section are
- to provide you, on the one hand, with a few more detailed
examples how biofilms can be used in beneficial ways;
- to give you, on the other hand, a few more detailed
examples of some of the harmful impacts of biofilms.
Outcomes
Upon completion of this section, you will be able
- to discuss more detailed examples of both the beneficial and
harmful impacts of biofilms on our world;
- to describe in an informal way how the biofilm mechanism works
to achieve either a beneficial or harmful effect, based on the
situation in which the biofilm appears.
|
OVERVIEW
|
|
From exploring sections 1 and 2 you have learned
that biofilms
-
are a natural and important part of our world
-
are found virtually everywhere on earth, including in
extreme environments
-
are an integral part of the human body
-
can be quite harmful to human health
-
cause industry all sorts of problems and expense
-
have beneficial uses as well as harmful impacts
In this section we explore some of these impacts
of biofilms in more detail. Remember as you explore this
section that although we speak of biofilms as the single issue we
are exploring, there are many, many different kinds of biofilms,
each made up of colonies of different microorganisms, which is why
some can be good and others bad.
Both some beneficial and
some
detrimental aspects of biofilms are
summarized below. |
|
|
BENEFICIAL BIOFILMS
|
In natural environments
|
|
As we have already pointed out, biofilms are all
around us, on us, and in us. Obviously, then, not all biofilms
are harmful. Many play an important role in the ecology of the earth
and the sustainability of life in general. The report, "Global Environmental Change: Microbial Contributions,
Microbial Solutions," points out: ". . .the basic chemistry of Earth's
surface is determined by biological activity, especially that of the
many trillions of microbes in soil and water. Microbes make up the
majority of the living biomass on Earth and, as such, have major
roles in the recycling of elements vital to life."
Imagine that! "Microbes make up the majority of the living
biomass on Earth," and, as we are learning, those microbes often
live in biofilm colonies on surfaces.
For example, it is known that bacteria are early colonizers
(in a biofilm) of initially clean surfaces
submerged in water. Scientists have been able to document a
predictable pattern of the way in which biofilms form on a clean
surface under water. Whether the
surface in question is a boat hull floating on top of the water, or a new deep sea vent at the
bottom of the ocean, microbes are already present in the those
environments and are capable of rapid
attachment to and community development as a biofilm on those surfaces (the boat
hull or the deep sea vent).
It is important to recognize that microorganisms,
such as bacteria, that colonize in biofilms have evolved along with
other organisms, including human beings. While some bacteria produce
effects that are bad for other organisms, most bacteria are harmless
or even beneficial. When it comes to bacteria, higher organisms
(like us) are just another environment to colonize. So here's
a thought: humans, who are often thought to be the colonizers of the
world, are themselves the target of colonial powers, in the form of the many
microorganisms that sneak into and inhabit our body!
|
Water and wastewater treatment
|
|
One of the best examples of successful, beneficial
application biofilms to solve a huge problem is in the cleaning of
wastewater. Think of it this way. We know that microorganisms
are the main agents that cause decay in dead plants and animals. Decay
happens (partly) as the microorganisms feed on the tissue of the dead
organism. Since that is true, perhaps one could engineer a system
that uses the proper microorganisms (in the form of a biofilm) to process
wastewater and sewage: if the contaminated water were passed through
such a biofilm, perhaps the microorganisms in the biofilm would eat (and
thus remove) the harmful organic material from the water. |
 |
|
Good idea! Indeed, even before biofilms were recognized and
became the subject of intense research, engineers were taking advantage of natural biofilm
environmental activity (without knowing about biofilms) in developing water-cleaning systems. Biofilms have been used successfully in water and
wastewater treatment for well over a century. English engineers developed
the first sand filter treatment methods for both water and
wastewater treatment in the 1860s. In such filtration systems the
the filter medium (i.e., sand) presents surfaces to which
microbes that feed on the organic material in the water being treated can
attach. The result? The formation of a beneficial biofilm that
eats the "bad" stuff in the water, effectively filtering it. Of course, we
don't want the microorganisms in the biofilm to get into the filtered
water, or for chunks of biofilm to detach from the colony and make it
through the system. Ideally, the biofilm stays attached to the
filtration system and can be cleaned when the system is flushed. |
|
Interestingly, scientists and water treatment engineers have
discovered that drinking water and wastewater that have been processed
with a biofilm system in a treatment plant are
more "biologically stable" than water filtered by other types of treatment systems.
This just means that there is likely to be less
microorganism contamination in water
that has passed through a
biofilm-based filter than there is in water that
has passed through some alternative treatment system. This implies
that biofilm treated water typically has lower
disinfectant demand (e.g., use of chlorine) and disinfection by-product formation
(e.g., that unsavory taste and smell of chlorine) potential
than water treated in other ways if the water prior to treatment is high in
the kind of nutrients the biofilm craves (which in this case is
organic carbon).
People are finicky. We want our
drinking water to be crystal clear, have no odd odor, and to taste, well,
like pure water. Water that is safe to drink because of being
treated with chlorine can still have an odd color, smell bad, and taste
worse. So, drinking water utilities go to great lengths to provide
us with the kind of drinking water we want (using ozone in the primary
treatment phase is one approach that is used). In any such system, a
biofilm treatment phase may well be one approach that will help yield the
desired result.
|
Remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater
|
|
One of the less obvious beneficial applications of
biofilms is in cleaning up oil and gasoline spills. That's right,
certain bacteria will eat oil and gasoline. Remember that oil was
produced over many years by decaying vegetation, so it is an organic
compound. We wouldn't recommend that you suck up any spilled oil or
gasoline, but the fact that some of the naturally occurring bacteria
in soil love the stuff leads to a new idea: bioremediation. This is
a term that refers to the engineering of a biofilm that can be introduced
into the area of an oil or gasoline spill to help clean up the mess, and
all with natural, non-harmful means.
|
 |
|
Indeed, bioremediation
using biofilms has emerged as a technology of choice for
cleaning up groundwater and soil at many sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. Bioremediation results in
-
the reduction of both
contaminant concentration and mass for many subsurface contaminants
(e.g., petroleum hydrocarbons and
chlorinated organics) and/or
-
a beneficial speciation
change in the bacteria in the biofilm that allow
them to tackle other contaminants, such as heavy metals
(such as mercury)
In other words, bioremdiation is a
great idea! How to actually make it work requires an understanding
of biofilm processes and engineering systems for introducing a biofilm
into the contaminated ground and providing the necessary environment below
the surface of the ground to encourage the biofilm to do its job
(illustrated in the diagram above). For students interested in this
topic, the study of biofilms and engineering (e.g., environmental
engineering or chemical engineering). Just keep on truckin', and you
will get there.
|
Microbial leaching
|
|
As you probably know, mining for
precious metals of various kinds (gold, silver, copper and so forth) is a
messy job. The desired metal is not generally found in nice, big,
pure chunks. The largest gold nugget ever found was reputed to weigh
about 70 Kilograms. But most gold, as with all other precious
metals, is generally hard to see with the naked eye, mixed in the ground
with dirt, rocks, and other ground debris--the ore from which the gold
must be extracted (note that the ore in a good copper mine, for instance,
will typically consist of less than 1% copper). The extraction process,
when done with chemicals, is called "leaching." For years, the
leaching of copper, for example, was done with acid. Not good, very
not good for the environment. In fact, most leaching technologies
have resulted in toxic leftovers.
Well, guess what? Today
approximately 10 to 20 percent of copper mined in the United States is
extracted from low grade ore with the assistance of biofilms. And
mining companies are making a considerable investment to extend this
process to the extraction of other precious metals.
How is a biofilm engineered to
accomplish this job? Again, one must find a bacteria with a
particular appetite--one that would eat the ore, say, that encased copper
particles, thus releasing the copper to be recovered. This idea has led to
the most common biofilm supported leaching process, called "heap
leaching." Low grade ore is placed in a "heap," and sprayed with a
mildly acidified water solution that encourages the growth of a particular
bacteria that eats away at the ore, releasing water soluble cupric ion
(copper) that can then be recovered from the water.
|
Other biofilm technologies with promise
...coming soon.
Microbial fuel cells
Biofilm "traps"
Microbial "canaries" |
|
|
|
In natural environments
|
|
Note: This
subsection is not yet well-developed. However, you can get a
glimpse of some of the detrimental effects of biofilms in the
natural environment by continuing to read.
Note from the quote below the
wide-ranging impact of biofilms on the environment.
"Microbes can negatively
impact environments on a global level including producing and
consuming atmospheric gases that affect climate; mobilizing toxic
elements such as mercury, arsenic and selenium; and producing toxic
algal blooms and creating oxygen depletion zones in lakes, rivers
and coastal environments (eutrophication). Furthermore, the
incidence of microbial diseases such as plague, cholera, Lyme
disease, and West Nile Virus are linked to global change."
|
In industrial environments
|
|
Until this section is fully
developed, recall from section 2 that biofouling, biocorrosion, equipment damage and
product contamination are constant and expensive problems in
industry. Review the
slide show in Section 2 of this
module for an overview of these problems.. |
Public health
|
Note. This subsection is
also not yet complete, but it does give you a sense of the
wide-ranging influence of bad biofilms on public health.
Between 1980 and 1992, infectious
disease deaths increased by 58% (39% after age adjustment); the
major contributors were HIV infection and AIDS, respiratory disease
(primarily pneumonia), and bloodstream infection. Infectious
diseases are still broadly endemic, which just
means that they never really go away for good, and are just part of
the health landscape That is, there
is a large supply of the infectious agents that cause infectious
diseases that keep the diseases alive. Infectious diseases
remain the leading cause of death worldwide and the third leading
cause of death in the United States. In the United States, each
year, approximately 25% of physician visits are attributable to
infectious diseases, with direct and indirect costs estimated at
more than $120 billion.
Here is a new
twist to this old story. Biofilms have been implicated in the
spread of infectious diseases. Why? Research shows
biofilms to be reservoirs for pathogenic
organisms and sources of disease outbreaks.
As a result, biotechnology measures are being created
to control biofilms and/or sever the routes by which pathogenic
organisms are transmitted from biofilms to susceptible people.
Biofilms are implicated in otitis media,
the most common acute ear infection in children in the U.S. Other
diseases in which biofilms play a role include bacterial
endocarditis (infection of the inner surface of the heart and
its valves), cystic fibrosis (a chronic disorder resulting in
increased susceptibility to serious lung infection), and
Legionnaire's disease (an acute respiratory infection resulting
from the aspiration of clumps of Legionnella biofilms
detached from air and water heating/cooling and distribution
systems).
Biofilms
may also be responsible for a wide variety of nosocomial
(hospital-acquired) infections. Sources of biofilm-related infections
can include the surfaces of catheters, medical implants, wound
dressings, or other types of medical devices.
Biofilms avidly colonize many household surfaces,
including toilets, sinks, countertops, and cutting boards in the
kitchen and bath. Poor disinfection practices and ineffective
cleaning products may increase the incidence of illnesses associated
with pathogenic organisms in the household environment.
|
|
Test your
knowledge | Go to Section
Four |
|
Section 4: What are key
characteristics of biofilms? |
|
|